Aerospace industry staffing costs 2026

---

Aerospace industry staffing costs 2026: the full picture

Aerospace labor is expensive for specific, structural reasons. Engineers command above-average pay across virtually every role, and the specialty gap between a cleared senior propulsion engineer and a mid-career software developer at a tech startup runs well into six figures. Security clearances extend hiring timelines and add direct cost. Production ramp-ups at Boeing and Airbus are running into a shortage of certificated A&P mechanics that has been building for a decade. And the defense side operates under government cost accounting rules that make labor cost management a compliance function as much as an economic one.

This article pulls verified data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Aerospace Industries Association, Oliver Wyman's MRO workforce research, Aviation Week, the FAA, the Defense Contract Audit Agency, and SHRM to give aerospace HR leaders, program managers, and finance executives an accurate baseline for what aerospace staffing costs in 2026.

---

1. The workforce behind the numbers

The U.S. aerospace and defense industry directly employs approximately 2.1 million workers, according to the Aerospace Industries Association's 2025 Aerospace and Defense: The Industry Report. That figure covers commercial airframe and engine manufacturing, defense systems, missiles and space, and the maintenance, repair, and overhaul sector. It does not count the broader supply chain, which the AIA estimates supports an additional 3.2 million jobs indirectly.

The industry generated roughly $950 billion in combined commercial and defense revenue in 2024. By dollar value, it is the largest net export contributor in U.S. manufacturing. Labor intensity varies by segment - commercial production is more capital-intensive per unit than MRO, and defense programs are more labor-intensive than commercial ones due to lower production volumes and higher design complexity. But across segments, direct labor consistently accounts for 25 to 40 percent of program cost, and indirect labor (program management, engineering support, quality, supply chain, contracts) adds another 15 to 25 percent.

• BLS projects aerospace engineer employment to grow 6 percent between 2022 and 2032, faster than the average for all occupations (BLS Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2023-2024 edition).
• Aircraft mechanic and service technician employment is projected to grow 6 percent over the same period, driven by a combination of fleet growth and the retirement wave among current certificated mechanics.
• Avionics technician employment is projected to grow 4 percent through 2032, constrained by relatively slow fleet avionics refresh cycles in commercial aviation.

The projections understate the near-term pressure because they measure net employment change, not gross replacement need. A large share of the current aerospace workforce is within 10 years of retirement, and the pipeline of new entrants from aerospace engineering programs and aviation maintenance technician schools has not kept pace with combined retirement and growth demand.

---

2. Wages by role: 2026 national averages

The Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics program, updated through May 2024 and released in March 2025, provides the most reliable national wage baseline for aerospace roles. The figures below reflect median annual wages for full-time workers in aerospace-related occupations.

Source: BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2024 (released March 2025).

These are medians. Top-decile aerospace engineers in high-demand specialties - propulsion, structures, avionics systems integration, and software-intensive platforms - routinely earn $160,000 to $195,000 in base salary at major primes. The 90th percentile BLS figure for aerospace engineers is $168,370. At defense-prime employers (Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, Boeing Defense), senior engineers with active TS/SCI clearances can command total compensation packages of $175,000 to $220,000 when bonuses and profit-sharing are included.

---

3. Fully loaded labor costs: beyond base wage

Base wages are a starting point. The fully loaded cost of an aerospace employee is substantially higher, and the gap between base and loaded cost is wider in aerospace than in most industries because of clearance costs, specialized insurance requirements, and the cost of maintaining certifications and technical currency.

A representative cost breakdown for a mid-career aerospace engineer earning the BLS median of $122,270:

Source: Modeled from AIA 2025 compensation benchmarking data; BLS Employer Costs for Employee Compensation, December 2024; Aerospace Corporation workforce cost research.

At $174,270, the fully loaded cost is 42 percent above base salary. For engineers working in classified programs with SCI-level access, clearance investigation and polygraph costs can push the security component to $8,000-$12,000 per employee per year, and facility security costs add further overhead. A cleared engineer on a classified program at a major defense contractor typically costs 45 to 55 percent above base when all indirect costs are included.

---

4. Defense vs. commercial: two different labor cost structures

Aerospace labor costs look different depending on which side of the ledger you are on. Commercial manufacturing and MRO operate in a relatively straightforward market framework. Defense work, particularly cost-type contract work, operates under government cost accounting rules administered by the Defense Contract Audit Agency that make labor cost management a compliance exercise as much as an economic one.

Commercial manufacturing and MRO

Commercial aircraft production - Boeing 737/787, Airbus A320/A350 and their derivatives - is highly structured and production-rate sensitive. When production rates rise, direct labor cost per unit typically falls because of learning curve effects. Boeing's published learning curve targets assume approximately 80 percent learning, meaning labor hours per unit fall by 20 percent each time cumulative production doubles.

The disruption of production ramp-ups is expensive in labor terms. Boeing's 737 MAX grounding and subsequent production rate recovery added substantial non-recurring labor cost to the program because experienced workers dispersed during the shutdown and had to be rehired and retrained. Industry analysts at Aviation Week estimated the total labor cost premium of the 737 MAX rate recovery at over $1.5 billion across 2022 and 2023 (Aviation Week Network, 2024 MRO & Workforce Outlook).

Defense programs

Government cost accounting standards (CAS), applied to defense contracts above certain thresholds, require that labor costs be tracked, allocated, and justified by program in specific ways. The DCAA audits indirect rates - fringe benefits, overhead, and general and administrative costs - and disallows charges that do not meet government standards.

Typical indirect rate structures for a mid-size defense contractor in 2025:

Source: DCAA Contract Audit Manual; industry composite from PricewaterhouseCoopers Defense Contractor Benchmarking, 2025.

At the midpoint of these ranges, a defense contractor billing $100,000 in direct labor will typically carry $55,000 to $75,000 in indirect costs, for a total program labor cost of $155,000 to $175,000. DCAA compliance - maintaining audit-ready timekeeping, cost segregation, and allowability documentation - adds an estimated 3 to 7 percent to total program overhead at mid-size contractors (National Defense Industrial Association, DCAA Compliance Cost Survey, 2025).

---

5. The MRO technician shortage: the most acute workforce gap

The commercial MRO sector is facing a technician crisis that is already affecting aircraft utilization rates, maintenance turnaround times, and labor costs across the industry.

• Oliver Wyman's 2024 MRO Workforce Study projects a global shortage of more than 42,000 commercial aviation technicians by 2030. The U.S. accounts for roughly 35 percent of global MRO demand, implying a domestic shortage on the order of 14,000 to 17,000 certificated A&P mechanics by 2030.
• The FAA counted approximately 161,000 active airframe and powerplant (A&P) mechanic certificates in the U.S. as of 2024, but the active workforce is smaller because a meaningful share of certificate holders are retired, inactive, or working in adjacent roles.
• Aviation Technician Education Council (ATEC) data shows that U.S. Aviation Maintenance Technician Schools (AMTS) graduated approximately 6,800 A&P-eligible students in 2024, well below the estimated 10,000-12,000 annual entrants needed to cover attrition and growth (ATEC, 2024 Annual Report).
• The median age of certificated U.S. A&P mechanics is now approximately 51 years old. The retirement wave is already underway (FAA Airmen Certification Database analysis, 2024).
• Airlines and MRO providers have responded by raising wages. Base pay for experienced line A&P mechanics at major U.S. carriers and MRO shops reached $40 to $55 per hour in 2025, compared to $28 to $38 in 2020 - a 40 to 50 percent increase in five years driven by competitive pressure (ATA labor contract data, 2025).

The wage data above tells the story directly: base pay for experienced line mechanics rose 40 to 50 percent in five years. Delta TechOps, United's Technical Operations, and independent providers including StandardAero and Chromalloy have all cited rising mechanic wages as the primary driver of MRO cost inflation in 2024 and 2025 investor communications.

---

6. Aerospace engineering salary data by state

Geography matters significantly in aerospace. California (home to Lockheed Skunk Works, Northrop Grumman Space, SpaceX, and dozens of defense and commercial primes) and Washington State (home to Boeing Commercial) are the two highest-cost aerospace labor markets in the country.

Annual median wages for aerospace engineers by state, selected markets (BLS, May 2024):

Source: BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2024.

California's premium reflects both the cost of living and the concentration of classified defense and space work in Los Angeles, San Diego, and the Inland Empire, where clearance demand keeps engineering wages structurally elevated. Alabama (Huntsville, home to Redstone Arsenal, NASA MSFC, and multiple defense primes) and Kansas (Wichita, the general aviation manufacturing capital) are at the lower-cost end of the market.

---

7. Labor shortage: recruiting costs and time-to-fill

Filling aerospace engineering and technical positions takes significantly longer than the cross-industry average, and the costs are higher as a result.

• Time-to-fill for aerospace engineering roles requiring an active security clearance averages 90 to 130 days, according to ClearanceJobs market data for 2025. For TS/SCI positions, 120 to 160 days is typical.
• Unfilled clearance-required positions carry an opportunity cost of roughly $575 to $850 per day in lost billable hours on cost-type contracts, based on the cleared engineer salary range and applicable indirect rates.
• Direct recruiting cost for aerospace engineers without clearance averages $18,000 to $32,000 per hire using specialized technical recruiters or retained search, per Robert Half's Engineering and Technology Salary Guide 2026.
• For cleared positions, recruiting premiums of 20 to 30 percent above standard engineering recruiting fees are common, reflecting the smaller eligible candidate pool and longer placement timeline.
• Time-to-fill for A&P mechanics at MRO facilities averaged 58 days in 2025, up from 34 days in 2021 (Aviation Pros Salary Survey, 2025). Some regional MRO operators report open requisitions that have gone unfilled for more than 90 days.
• Sign-on bonuses for experienced A&P mechanics with relevant type ratings (737, 787, A320) reached $10,000 to $25,000 at major airlines and MRO shops in 2025 - a direct reflection of the scarcity premium on this talent (ATA Mechanic Compensation Benchmarking, 2025).

---

8. Contractor reliance in aerospace

Aerospace firms, particularly on the defense side, have long relied on contract labor as a buffer between program funding cycles. Government contracts often prohibit converting contractors to full-time employees above certain ratios, and multi-year contract awards create demand that firms are unwilling to staff with permanent headcount given program uncertainty.

• Defense contractors staff approximately 25 to 35 percent of their program workforce through contract labor on large development programs, based on NDIA workforce survey data (2025).
• Contractor labor bill rates for cleared senior engineers in defense programs typically run $175 to $280 per hour (all-inclusive), compared to a fully loaded cost of $90 to $130 per hour for the same skill level as a direct employee. The premium reflects contractor overhead, profit margin, and the absence of benefits obligations.
• For classified programs, contractor firms are required to manage security costs and compliance obligations, which partially offsets the apparent premium when viewed from the prime contractor's perspective.
• On commercial production programs, contract manufacturing labor is used extensively during rate ramp-ups. Boeing's Supplier Managed Inventory and production support contracts bring in thousands of contract workers at rate peaks, with all-inclusive bill rates for skilled production workers typically running $65 to $95 per hour.
• The gig and freelance engineering trend that has reshaped other technical industries has had limited penetration in aerospace due to ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations) restrictions on who may access controlled technical data, which effectively bars non-citizens and uncleared personnel from most production and design roles.

---

9. Turnover costs in aerospace

Aerospace turnover dynamics differ by segment. Commercial production workers and MRO technicians have relatively high mobility within the industry, particularly during periods of wage competition. Defense engineers are more stable once cleared, because the clearance transfers with them and competing defense employers actively recruit cleared personnel rather than sponsoring new ones from scratch.

• Annual voluntary turnover for aerospace engineers across all segments was approximately 8 to 12 percent in 2025, compared to a cross-industry professional average of 13 percent (BLS JOLTS, 2025; AIA HR Benchmarking Survey, 2025).
• The lower turnover rate is partly a function of clearance binding - engineers with clearances face fewer external offers because the eligible employer pool is restricted to cleared facilities. But it also reflects genuine retention investment by major defense primes.
• For commercial aviation technicians (A&P mechanics), annual turnover reached 18 to 24 percent at smaller MRO operators in 2025, as larger carriers and shops with higher pay scales pulled talent from regional and independent MRO (ATEC, 2025 Workforce Survey).
• SHRM's 2025 Talent Acquisition Benchmarking Report puts replacement cost for mid-level professional and technical roles at 75 to 150 percent of annual salary. For a cleared aerospace engineer at $122,270, the replacement cost runs $92,000 to $183,000 when clearance reinvestigation time, recruiting fees, and the 6 to 12 month ramp-up period before a new hire achieves full technical productivity are included.
• Losing a cleared engineer in a program-critical role can create schedule risk on government contracts with liquidated damages exposure. That cost never shows up in HR turnover reports, but it is real and often larger than the direct replacement cost.

---

10. The clearance premium: a staffing cost unique to defense

Security clearances are a major cost factor in defense aerospace that has no parallel in most other industries. The direct cost of obtaining and maintaining clearances, and the indirect cost of the longer hiring timelines they create, adds a material surcharge to defense labor.

• The government's average cost to investigate and adjudicate a Top Secret clearance was approximately $5,500 in 2024, per the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) Annual Report 2024. TS/SCI investigations with polygraph components can run $12,000 to $20,000 per person.
• Current investigation timelines: Secret clearances average 90 to 120 days from submission; Top Secret averages 180 to 365 days; TS/SCI with polygraph can exceed 18 months in the current backlog environment (DCSA, 2024; ClearanceJobs Industry Survey, 2025).
• Cleared engineer salaries command a 10 to 20 percent premium over equivalent uncleared roles at the same level, reflecting the scarcity of cleared candidates and the investment required to develop them (ClearanceJobs 2025 Salary Survey).
• Employers typically bear the full cost of initial clearance investigations and periodic reinvestigation (every 5 to 10 years depending on clearance level), creating a long-term carry cost per cleared employee of $1,000 to $3,000 annually when amortized over the average tenure.
• Approximately 1.3 million active personnel held federal security clearances as of the ODNI's 2023 Annual Report on Security Clearance Determinations. The supply of cleared candidates is finite and grows slowly relative to defense program demand.

---

11. Admin and program support overhead

Like other engineering-intensive industries, aerospace carries substantial indirect labor costs in program management, contracts administration, quality assurance, supply chain, and administrative support. These roles do not appear in direct labor cost but are a real component of total staffing spend.

• Administrative and program support functions (program control, contracts, procurement, finance, HR, and general administration) typically represent 18 to 28 percent of total workforce at a full-service defense prime or tier-1 aerospace supplier, per AIA HR Benchmarking Survey data (2025).
• Program control analysts - tracking earned value, forecast-to-complete, and contract funding - earn $75,000 to $115,000 at mid-size defense contractors, with requirements for EVMS certification and DCAA-compliant reporting adding to their effective scarcity (BLS 13-2099, May 2024).
• Contracts administrators with FAR/DFARS expertise command $80,000 to $130,000, and demand outpaces supply at cleared facilities where the role requires access authorization in addition to regulatory expertise.
• The administrative burden associated with DCAA compliance, export control (ITAR/EAR), and quality management systems (AS9100 certification maintenance) consumes significant program office time and drives the proportionally high indirect headcount in defense aerospace.

---

12. Aerospace firms and virtual support

Direct engineering and production roles in aerospace are not candidates for remote or virtual staffing. ITAR restrictions, facility requirements, and clearance obligations tie most technical work to specific physical locations. Administrative, business development support, and marketing functions are different - those have moved to remote and virtual models at aerospace firms of all sizes.

• Small and mid-size aerospace suppliers (under 500 employees) increasingly use remote executive assistants, proposal support specialists, and administrative coordinators to manage overhead. Firms with cleared facilities frequently work with cleared remote staff or use non-ITAR administrative functions handled by offshore or nearshore virtual teams.
• A full-time in-house administrative coordinator at a mid-size aerospace supplier costs $52,000 to $72,000 in base salary, plus 25 to 35 percent in benefits and overhead, for a total loaded cost of $65,000 to $97,000 per year (BLS OEWS 2024; SHRM Benefits Benchmarking 2025).
• Remote virtual assistants handling non-ITAR administrative tasks - travel coordination, expense reporting, meeting scheduling, document formatting, and vendor communication - cost $10,000 to $28,000 annually, representing a 60 to 75 percent reduction in cost for those specific functions.
• Proposal operations, a major overhead burden for firms pursuing government contracts, have been partially shifted to virtual teams for formatting, section assembly, graphics support, and compliance checklists - functions that do not require facility access or clearance. Stealth Agents' virtual assistant services are used by some small aerospace and defense firms for business development support coordination of this type.
• The distinction that matters is function scope. ITAR-controlled technical data, classified information, and program-facing defense work stays in-house. Administrative, business development, and internal coordination work without program sensitivity is where virtual and remote staffing works.

---

13. Key statistics summary

---

What aerospace staffing costs mean for 2026 planning

Aerospace industry staffing costs are not going to moderate significantly in the near term. The MRO technician shortage has years of structural underfunding to work through, and AMTS graduation rates would need to roughly double to close the gap by 2030. That means the wage inflation seen from 2020 to 2025 in the A&P mechanic market is likely to continue, and overtime costs at MRO shops will remain elevated as long as headcount runs below capacity.

On the engineering side, the cleared engineer market is the tightest part of the labor pool. Clearance timelines have improved marginally from their 2022-2023 peak but remain long enough to create real program schedule risk. The firms managing this best are the ones that build cleared pipelines in advance - sponsoring clearances for junior engineers before they need them on a specific program - rather than reacting to program awards by trying to hire cleared staff in a depleted market.

Defense program indirect rates are another area where management attention pays off. DCAA-allowable costs require proactive cost accounting discipline, not reactive cleanup. Firms that have invested in compliant timekeeping systems and trained their workforce on CAS requirements tend to run lower effective indirect rates than those that manage the audit reactively.

For smaller aerospace and defense suppliers, the most tractable cost lever is administration. Non-ITAR administrative work and proposal coordination are good candidates for virtual staffing - at $10,000 to $28,000 per year versus $65,000 to $97,000 for an in-house coordinator, the savings are real and don't require touching program-sensitive work.

For context on how aerospace staffing costs compare to adjacent manufacturing and technology sectors, see our research on manufacturing industry staffing costs, technology industry staffing costs, and automotive industry staffing costs. For firms evaluating total employment cost, the full cost of hiring an employee in 2026 provides a cross-industry framework.

---

Sources

1. Aerospace Industries Association (AIA). (2025). Aerospace and Defense: The Industry Report 2025. AIA.
2. Aerospace Industries Association (AIA). (2025). 2025 HR and Compensation Benchmarking Survey. AIA Workforce Council.
3. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025, March). Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2024. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/oes/
4. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023). Occupational Outlook Handbook: Aerospace Engineers. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/aerospace-engineers.htm
5. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023). Occupational Outlook Handbook: Aircraft and Avionics Equipment Mechanics and Technicians. U.S. Department of Labor.
6. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025). Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS), 2025. U.S. Department of Labor.
7. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025). Employer Costs for Employee Compensation, December 2024. U.S. Department of Labor.
8. Oliver Wyman. (2024). MRO Survey 2024: Aviation Industry Workforce Outlook. Oliver Wyman Aviation, Aerospace, and Defense.
9. Aviation Technician Education Council (ATEC). (2024). 2024 Annual Report: Aviation Maintenance Technician School Enrollment and Graduation Data. ATEC.
10. Aviation Technician Education Council (ATEC). (2025). 2025 Workforce Survey: MRO Technician Supply and Demand. ATEC.
11. Federal Aviation Administration. (2024). Airmen Certification Database - Active Certificate Holders, December 2024. FAA.
12. Defense Contract Audit Agency. (2025). DCAA Contract Audit Manual, 2025 Edition. U.S. Department of Defense.
13. Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA). (2024). Annual Report on Personnel Security Investigations and Adjudications FY2024. DCSA.
14. Office of the Director of National Intelligence. (2023). Annual Report on Security Clearance Determinations, FY2023. ODNI.
15. National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA). (2025). 2025 DCAA Compliance Cost Survey: Contractor Administrative Burden Study. NDIA.
16. ClearanceJobs. (2025). 2025 Cleared Workforce Compensation Survey. ClearanceJobs / DICE.
17. Robert Half. (2026). 2026 Salary Guide: Engineering and Technology. Robert Half International.
18. Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (2025). 2025 Talent Acquisition Benchmarking Report. SHRM.
19. Aviation Week Network. (2024). 2024 MRO and Workforce Outlook: Commercial Aviation Maintenance Labor Markets. Informa/Aviation Week.