Key Takeaways
- A denial rate needs a plan type, claim unit, service year, and denominator.
- Marketplace claim data should not be treated as a rate for all U.S. insurance.
- Reason codes and appeal outcomes are more actionable than one blended percentage.
Medical billing denial statistics can refer to a claim, a claim line, a service, a prior authorization request, or an entire encounter. Those units produce different rates. Any comparison should state the payer type, year, denominator, and whether the result includes corrected and resubmitted claims.
Marketplace claim evidence
KFF's analysis of federal Marketplace transparency data found that insurers denied 19% of in-network claims in 2023. The analysis also found that consumers appealed a very small share of denied claims. These results cover HealthCare.gov issuers that reported usable data. They are not a denial rate for Medicare, Medicaid, employer plans, or all medical practices.
CMS publishes Medicare Advantage organization determinations, reconsiderations, and appeals data. Those tables follow program definitions and should not be blended with commercial claim-line data. CMS also finalized interoperability and prior authorization requirements that set process and reporting expectations for affected payers.
What a practice should track
Report initial denials by payer, reason code, service, location, and submitting team. Keep first-pass acceptance separate from eventual payment. Measure days from denial to correction, appeal rate, appeal result, write-off value, and repeated root cause.
A medical virtual assistant can check claim status, maintain approved work queues, and collect documentation under a HIPAA-compliant process. Clinical decisions, coding judgments, and appeal representations need qualified oversight.
Sources
Tags
Ready to put this into practice?
Book a free 15-min match call
Tell us what role you're filling. We'll match you with a pre-vetted virtual assistant - or tell you honestly if we're not the right fit.
Book a free call →