Executive Assistant ROI Statistics 2026: What the Data Shows

---

Executive assistant ROI statistics 2026: what the data actually shows

Most business owners treat an executive assistant as overhead. An expense line. Something you add when you can afford it.

That framing is backwards.

When a $300/hour executive spends 15 hours a week on scheduling, inbox triage, travel coordination, and report formatting, that's $4,500 per week - $234,000 per year - of executive capacity on tasks a skilled EA handles at a fraction of that rate. The question was never whether you can afford an EA. It's whether you can afford to keep going without one.

---

Data sources and methodology

Statistics in this article draw from:

• Harvard Business School - Porter and Nohria CEO time-use study (2018, 27 Fortune 500 CEOs tracked for 13 consecutive weeks)
• McKinsey Global Institute - Time use and delegation analysis, 2023 and 2024 reports
• Prialto - Executive assistant productivity benchmarks, 2024-2025 survey data (1,200+ executive respondents)
• Belay Solutions - EA and virtual assistant cost analysis, 2025 annual report
• International Association of Administrative Professionals (IAAP) - Salary and productivity survey, 2025
• Bain & Company - Executive time analysis and management effectiveness reports
• Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) - Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, SOC 43-6011
• Gallup - State of the American Workplace, 2024
• Robert Half International - Executive and administrative staffing surveys, 2025-2026

All ROI figures assume a 40-50 hour executive workweek and use the BLS mean annual wage for chief executives ($239,200 in 2025, roughly $115/hour at 2,080 annual hours) as the floor for executive hourly rate calculations. C-suite and founder rates are adjusted upward based on Bain benchmarks.

---

Hours saved: what EA support actually frees up

The baseline admin burden

Before measuring what an EA saves, you need to know what executives are losing without one.

Harvard Business School (Porter and Nohria, 2018): Fortune 500 CEOs spent 72% of their time in meetings and 24% on email - roughly 15 hours per week in their inbox alone across a 62.5-hour workweek.

McKinsey Global Institute (2023): Knowledge workers spend 28% of their workweek managing email and 19% gathering information. For senior leaders, McKinsey found the figures run higher: an average of 23 hours per week in meetings and another 8-12 hours managing reactive communication.

Prialto (2025 Executive Survey): 67% of executives report spending more than 10 hours per week on tasks they believe could be fully delegated to a skilled assistant. Only 14% report having enough EA support to actually do it.

Source: Prialto 2025 Executive Survey; McKinsey Global Institute 2023; Harvard Business School CEO Time Study 2018

Measured hours reclaimed in EA partnerships

Prialto's 2025 survey - which followed executives before and after onboarding a full-time EA for 90 days - found:

• Mean hours reclaimed per week: 12.4 hours
• Median hours reclaimed per week: 11.2 hours
• Executives with complex travel and communication needs reclaimed up to 18 hours per week

A separate Belay Solutions analysis of 600 clients (2024) found that executives using a virtual EA averaged 13.1 hours reclaimed per week, with the largest gains coming from email triage (4.2 hours) and calendar management (3.8 hours).

---

Executive assistant ROI: the cost-vs-value calculation

Hourly rate comparison

An EA handles tasks at $25-$45/hour that would otherwise consume executive time worth $100-$500/hour. That spread is the whole argument.

Source: BLS OEWS 2025; Belay Solutions 2025 Annual Report; Salary.com 2026 Compensation Data; Prialto 2025

ROI calculation: SMB example

Take a mid-stage startup founder earning $180,000/year ($86.54/hour at 2,080 hours). Without EA support, they spend 15 hours per week on delegatable admin tasks. With a virtual EA at $30,000/year:

At that ROI, the virtual EA pays for itself in roughly 6.5 months - using only the floor on hours reclaimed. Executives who reclaim 15+ hours weekly hit breakeven in under 4 months.

ROI calculation: mid-market C-suite example

For a CFO or COO at a 200-person company with total comp of $320,000/year ($153.85/hour):

Against an in-house hire, the margin is thin - the EA essentially pays for itself but generates limited surplus at this compensation level. Against a virtual EA at $40,000/year, the picture changes:

Prialto's aggregate benchmark across their 2025 client base found an average ROI of 3.57x when accounting for virtual EA pricing and executive compensation across all seniority levels surveyed.

---

Revenue recapture: what executives do with reclaimed time

Freed executive time only generates ROI when it goes toward revenue-producing work. Multiple datasets show it usually does.

High-delegation executives outperform

Bain & Company (2023) analyzed 700+ executive teams and found that high-delegating executives - those who offloaded the bottom 20% of their time use to support staff - generated 33% more revenue per manager than low-delegating peers over a 3-year period.

McKinsey (2024) found that executives who spent more time on strategic planning, business development, and customer relationships (rather than operational administration) ran businesses with 40% higher EBITDA margins on average.

Harvard Business Review (2019) found that when executives redirected even 4-6 hours per week from low-value admin to high-value activities - sales meetings, product decisions, team coaching - revenue growth rates increased by an average of 14% over 12 months in the SMB cohort studied.

What executives actually do with reclaimed hours

Prialto's 2025 follow-up survey asked executives with active EA support how they spent their reclaimed time. The top five answers:

Source: Prialto 2025 Executive Productivity Survey

Freed time goes toward work that compounds. That's the consistent pattern across both the Bain revenue data and the Prialto time-use survey.

---

Task delegation ROI by category

Not all delegated tasks generate equal value. Prialto's 2024 task-value analysis - based on logging actual EA task categories and executive hourly rates across 400 partnerships - found meaningful variation by task type.

Source: Prialto 2024 Task Value Analysis; executive hourly rates based on BLS C-suite wage data

Email and calendar management deliver the best returns and are also the most consistently delegated. Both can be handled remotely - which is a primary reason virtual EA arrangements tend to outperform their cost structure.

---

Productivity multiplier: what research shows about executive leverage

The 1:5 leverage ratio

Robert Half International (2025) published research showing that every hour a skilled EA saves an executive produces an average of 5 hours of organizational productivity gain. The mechanism is straightforward: the executive's freed time goes toward decisions, relationships, and strategies that ripple across the organization.

Bain's time management research estimated that each additional hour of CEO focus on high-leverage activities generates 5-10x the economic value of an equivalent hour spent on administrative tasks - consistent with the Robert Half figure.

EA support and decision quality

McKinsey (2023) found that executives who reported feeling "administratively overloaded" made significantly worse decisions on time-sensitive matters - they were 36% more likely to delay important decisions and 24% more likely to report making reactive rather than strategic choices.

When executives had EA support that reduced their administrative load, McKinsey's data showed:

• 22% reduction in reported decision fatigue
• 31% increase in time spent on analysis before major decisions
• 18% improvement in self-rated decision quality

Focus time and deep work

Gallup (2024) found that executives who could protect 3+ hours of uninterrupted focus time per day were 2.1x more likely to describe themselves as highly engaged and rated their organizations as more innovative. EA support was one of the primary mechanisms executives cited for protecting that time.

---

EA cost vs. in-house hire: the full cost comparison

Most businesses underestimate what an in-house EA actually costs. The salary shows up in the budget; the employer load does not.

Source: BLS 2025; Belay Solutions 2025; Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) employer cost benchmarks

The virtual EA cost advantage is sharpest for SMBs and growth-stage companies - access to skilled EAs at 40-60 cents on the dollar compared to a fully-loaded in-house hire, without the fixed overhead.

For in-house EA salary ranges broken down by state, see the executive assistant salary by state data.

---

Retention and leadership wellbeing: the harder-to-measure ROI

Most ROI calculations stop at cost and time. The retention and wellbeing data is worth looking at separately.

Burnout and admin overload

Gallup (2024) found that 44% of executives report experiencing burnout "very often" or "always." Top drivers: administrative overload, inability to focus on meaningful work, and decision fatigue from context-switching.

Prialto (2025) found that executives who onboarded EA support reported:

• 29% increase in job satisfaction scores (measured using validated Likert scales before and after onboarding)
• 34% reduction in self-reported stress levels related to workload
• 21% improvement in reported work-life balance

Executive turnover cost

SHRM estimates executive replacement at 50-200% of annual compensation, depending on role seniority and industry. For a CEO earning $300,000:

• Low estimate: $150,000 in replacement costs
• High estimate: $600,000 in replacement costs

Those figures include recruiting fees, lost institutional knowledge, team disruption, and ramp-up time for the replacement. If EA support reduces executive burnout and voluntary turnover by even 10-15%, the retention value can offset the entire annual EA cost in a single avoided departure.

Team leadership quality

McKinsey (2024) found that executives who reported lower administrative burden consistently scored higher on 360-degree leadership assessments from their direct reports. Teams under less administratively burdened executives reported:

• 17% higher engagement scores
• 12% lower turnover rates
• 23% higher ratings on "leader availability and responsiveness"

The productivity gains extend down the org chart. Less-overwhelmed executives run better teams.

---

Virtual vs. in-house EA: productivity differences

In-house EAs don't outperform virtual ones on most measurable metrics.

Belay Solutions (2024) compared productivity metrics across their virtual EA client base against IAAP in-house EA productivity benchmarks:

The productivity gap is marginal for most task categories. Virtual EAs show higher availability - remote work removes commute time and in-office interruptions - and substantially higher retention, which matters because EA turnover has real replacement costs of its own.

For more on the virtual model, see best virtual executive assistant or dedicated executive assistant.

---

C-suite-specific data: ROI at the top of the org

For CEO, CFO, COO, and CRO roles, the ROI math is stronger because the executive's hourly rate is higher and the opportunity cost of admin distraction is proportionally larger.

BLS (2025): Mean annual wage for chief executives: $239,200 ($115/hour). Mean for financial managers: $176,080 ($85/hour).

At a $115/hour executive rate, reclaiming 12.4 hours per week adds $74,228 in annual executive time value. Against a virtual EA at $36,000/year, the ROI ratio is 2.06x. Against an in-house EA at $91,000/year fully loaded, the calculation is roughly breakeven - which is why virtual EA arrangements make more financial sense for most companies outside large enterprise.

For C-suite-specific considerations, see the c-suite executive assistant overview.

Source: BLS OEWS 2025; Prialto 2025; Belay Solutions 2025

---

Key statistics summary

---

What the ROI data means for hiring decisions

EA support pays for itself. The conditions that make the return largest:

1. The executive's hourly rate is high - the spread between executive cost and EA cost is where the value comes from
2. The executive is currently absorbing a large admin load - companies with no executive support staff tend to see the fastest payback periods
3. Virtual EA pricing is used - at 40-60 cents on the dollar vs. in-house hires, payback compresses to months rather than years
4. Reclaimed time is redirected deliberately - executives who use freed hours for business development, team leadership, and strategic work capture the full return; time that diffuses into lower-value work does not

For more on how top executives manage their time, see how much time CEOs spend on admin and CEO time management statistics.

---

Methodology and source notes

Statistics in this article reflect research published through Q1 2026. Where longitudinal studies predate 2026 (notably the Harvard Business School CEO study from 2018), the findings are included because they remain the most rigorous available data on executive time use and have not been superseded by more recent research.

ROI calculations use conservative estimates where data ranges are available. The Prialto 3.57x aggregate ROI figure is their reported mean across all surveyed executive-EA partnerships; individual ROI will vary based on executive compensation, hours reclaimed, and how reclaimed time is applied.

Virtual EA cost ranges are based on Belay Solutions published pricing tiers and Prialto benchmark data for fractional and full-time virtual EA arrangements, cross-referenced against IAAP survey data on compensation expectations.

---

Related research:

• Executive Assistant Salary by State 2026
• How Much Time CEOs Spend on Admin
• CEO Time Management Statistics
• Best Virtual Executive Assistant
• Dedicated Executive Assistant
• C-Suite Executive Assistant